<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 Failed Military Inventions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-failed-military-inventions.php/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-failed-military-inventions.php</link>
	<description>Life, on the short list.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:01:15 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jim</title>
		<link>http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-failed-military-inventions.php#comment-7501</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 17:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toptenz.net/?p=4079#comment-7501</guid>
		<description>Number 8 is crazy - need to put that on my bike! lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Number 8 is crazy &#8211; need to put that on my bike! lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NavyVet</title>
		<link>http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-failed-military-inventions.php#comment-5611</link>
		<dc:creator>NavyVet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 18:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toptenz.net/?p=4079#comment-5611</guid>
		<description>On #3 the propulsion method used for a nuclear powered ship is STEAM, the only difference is how the steam is generated, a reactor powered steam generator VS a conventional fuel boiler. You should have said the Charles de Gaulle was slower than the earlier boiler powered Aircraft Carriers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On #3 the propulsion method used for a nuclear powered ship is STEAM, the only difference is how the steam is generated, a reactor powered steam generator VS a conventional fuel boiler. You should have said the Charles de Gaulle was slower than the earlier boiler powered Aircraft Carriers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vince087</title>
		<link>http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-failed-military-inventions.php#comment-5406</link>
		<dc:creator>vince087</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toptenz.net/?p=4079#comment-5406</guid>
		<description>number 4 is sick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>number 4 is sick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert</title>
		<link>http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-failed-military-inventions.php#comment-5337</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toptenz.net/?p=4079#comment-5337</guid>
		<description>Re: number 7 - ramjet engines are not rockets.  They are entirely different methods of propulsion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: number 7 &#8211; ramjet engines are not rockets.  They are entirely different methods of propulsion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Chant</title>
		<link>http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-failed-military-inventions.php#comment-5233</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Chant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:36:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toptenz.net/?p=4079#comment-5233</guid>
		<description>Now that looks a lot like a recent list from cracked...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that looks a lot like a recent list from cracked&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Raanan Avidor</title>
		<link>http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-failed-military-inventions.php#comment-5232</link>
		<dc:creator>Raanan Avidor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toptenz.net/?p=4079#comment-5232</guid>
		<description>Actually the Scooter-mounted Cannon is in use. It is a motorbike with an Anti-tank guided missile on it but it is the same idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually the Scooter-mounted Cannon is in use. It is a motorbike with an Anti-tank guided missile on it but it is the same idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sbunting108</title>
		<link>http://www.toptenz.net/top-10-failed-military-inventions.php#comment-5225</link>
		<dc:creator>sbunting108</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 13:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.toptenz.net/?p=4079#comment-5225</guid>
		<description>Great list my two favourites were the corkscrew tank and the scooter mounted canon lol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great list my two favourites were the corkscrew tank and the scooter mounted canon lol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
