More Articles from Toptenz

38 Responses

  1. R4i at |

    Before figuring out where it was, though, we'd all ahve to first agree that it exists!

    Reply
  2. henry at |

    #9 could be referring to the global flood with noahs ark.

    Reply
    1. Somebody at |

      If so, then that would also need to be proven true, and not just a retelling of the Gilgamesh story, which is .. WAIT! That's right, most likely a gradually exaggerated oral account of ….

      Get this …

      #6 Black Sea flood.

      Learn your history. The Bible isn't the only source. Its inaccuracies are abundant.

      Reply
      1. Scooby Doo at |

        You base your “expertise” and knowledge on what now?

        Reply
  3. damgenius at |

    If the "lost island" was supposed to be large, and European man did not rediscover North America for several thousand years after Plato talked about Atlantis, couldn't Atlantis have actually been North and South America?

    Duh.

    Reply
    1. Dave Mowers at |

      No, because Ignatius Donnelley showed that ALL native American Indian cultures from South America to Mexico and Canada shared a similar story of their origins on an island, Aztlan in the Atlantic or great sea as they called it. The origin myths are all similar, a great catastrophe or flood destroys the birthplace of mankind and they escaped to North and South America on boats. Boats, mind you, none of the native could build or had ever built but described as identical to 15th and 16th century ships. One group of Indians is Caucasian, the Mandans and another group even spoke a version of Welsh language. Many of them talk about ancient giant men who wore crosses that came and taught them civilization or essentially Celtae-Sumerians.

      Reply
  4. fazrin at |

    awes0me!i love this list so much…but surprisingly only 5 people commented so far…

    Reply
  5. India Travel Package at |

    facts are so interesting about Atlantis

    Reply
  6. Dude at |

    atlantis does exist! believe it…but then again i may be lying.

    Reply
  7. Richard Welch at |

    To begin with, a couple of points: Plato never called Atlantis a continent, only an island. He never said it had an advanced technology, only that it had impressive buildings and canals. It was, in fact, a supervolcanic island a couple hundred miles off Portugal that exploded and sank in the 17th century BC i.e., it was exactly where Plato said it was (See Roots of Cataclysm, Algora Publ. NY 2009). Nearly all the other theories are completely outside the platonic parameters.

    Reply
    1. Dave Mowers at |

      …but Donnelley shows based on measurements given it was a continent-sized island much like Australia. Read his book.

      Reply
  8. dilisha at |

    i think ya it really existed but i have a reason a theory it was only flooded but a disastrous flood believe me or keep searching

    Reply
  9. MB at |

    #7 is an interesting theory and one I see usually pushed. Tho one variant I find annoying was claiming the island of Thera ITSELF was Atlantis, which I think is silly. (usually with a diagram of Atlantis and its canals superimposed over the island of Thera).

    #6 is another interesting modern explanation I’ve been hearing more and more.

    #4 & 3 are dubious, because AFAIK, the stories of Lemuria and Mu are modern creations NOT based on any sort of ancient legend/tradition.

    #1 another in this category are claims that atlantis is based on some location on the coast of spain.

    Reply
    1. Dave Mowers at |

      Paul Pezron in his Origin of Nations shows by all descriptions Crete was inhabited by Caucasian Celts. There is even a visual depiction of these peoples by Egyptians from thousands of years ago on a wall at the temple of Abydos which still has paint on the stone carving showing not only that they are Celts but that they all had long blond hair and beards. They same description is given in the Bible of the men of Moab, the Canaanites and look all the way back to ancient Persia or Sumeria and you see statues of long-haired, bearded Caucasians.

      As Pezron shows in every historical account of these peoples one trait about them that is bizarre but commonly found in all tribes everywhere you find this race is superstition. Whenever “God” or the “Gods” brought a plight upon them they uprooted and moved somewhere else establishing a new colony. Sound familiar?

      Reply
  10. NYJ at |

    #11. Atlantis was a hypothetical city to illustrate Plato’s discussion…which is specifically mentioned by Plato in the Timaeus

    Reply
    1. Dave Mowers at |

      I encourage anyone who believes that to go to You Tube and search for Graham Hancock and Atlantis. You will find, as he shows you, at a temple in Egypt which is identified with the Old Kingdom there is a stella or stone relief carved on the walls which tells the whole story of where the Egyptians came from. Now, can you guess what it says?

      If you’ve read Plato’s work you have already heard it.

      Remember, Troy was a “mythical” city as well. So was/is Achilles and yet in the Uluburun wreck is the very cup he and his Myrmidon drank from to celebrate victory. Read Gavin Menzies Lost Empire of Atlantis.

      Reply
  11. David at |
    Reply
  12. Nick at |

    #5 The theory of sudden cataclysmic movements in the earth’s crust or other sudden destructive events having no support in the scientific community stems back to a 18th or 19th century argument about whether the ice age happened as we’ve been told or if everything was caused by a horrendous cataclysm. In short the scientific community denies the possibility of cataclysms because they are scary and semi-ignorant people are more comfortable with a planet that always changes gradually. Because of this we readily believe that the northern hemisphere was covered with slowly moving sheet of ice miles thick that crawled over the earth for thousands of years. Coincidentally geological evidence shows that all the change which took place from 2,588,000 to 12,000 years BP could also have been caused by a terrible disaster around 12000 years ago. Which is also when Plato and hundreds of other civilizations stated that the “great flood” occurred.

    Reply
  13. Megan at |

    you don’t have to take everything plato said as true. there is no obligation to do that like you say in #1. for example, we know that plutarch was wrong in some of his facts concerning different greek figures, but we still accept his accounts because they are partially right (and pretty much all we have concerning many events). the same can be said for the accounts of marco polo, sure he messed up on some stuff concerning the mongolian empire, but we don’t believe everything he says and know what he messed up on. silly things like time and names dont always matter when there are multiple accounts to compare them to in order to find a more plausible story. that’s why myths and legends alike are studied by scholars, because their origins tell us something about history and give us insight into the beliefs of ancient cultures. just saying.

    Reply
    1. Dave Mowers at |

      To lie to a King in ancient times meant death, to tell falsehoods to crowds would result in death by stoning. When ancient people wrote something down as historical they meant it was to be taken as historical accounts of what actually happened. When you take the time to carve into stone an event it is because you mean to tell the truth. I think modern people take for granted the seriousness of our ancestors.

      Reply
      1. allen at |

        Well said! Our ancestors had a good reason to “carve into stone” their accounts; whether orally passed down through generation or shared ‘secret knowledge/wisdom’ from even more-previous related/unrelated societies and civilizations.

        So there must be some “truth” to the historical events that our ancestors knew. There must be an “origin” to the “oral accounts” passed on from generation to generation. And it surely wasn’t “mythical”…it was legend! Something that was believed and known to have happened!

        Reply
  14. Flower Delivery Guy at |

    I find all the theories relating to Atlantis interesting, what I find particularly interesting is how many people believe that Atlantis actually existed.

    Reply
  15. anon at |

    In short the scientific community denies the possibility of cataclysms because they are scary and semi-ignorant people are more comfortable with a planet that always changes gradually. Because of this we readily believe that the northern hemisphere was covered with slowly moving sheet of ice miles thick that crawled over the earth for thousands of years.

    Reply
  16. Hmm at |

    Wat about the whole of the Mediterranean …. What if the strait of Gibraltar was a more recent fixture in our world. Rising sea levels could have easily washed into the basin we now call the mediterranean . Rising sea levels plus a geological occurrence such as a earthquake could have easily separated the strait and created wat we call the mediterranean . Thus the great flood of the bible and pushing the civilization west into the fertile crescent. We already have knowledge that their are civilizations that predate what we thought we the beginnings of a stable urban environment

    Reply
  17. Julius at |

    Tropical Pangea existed and an advanced people existed with longetiviy. In time these intelligent people became violent(having supernatural powers). They were warned of an imminent flood and they continued in their sins. The animals sensing movement of the earth underneath moved to escape and Noah guided the animals to the Ark. The rains came and a massive world earthquake caused massive fissures on the earth releasing gallons of underground water. Pangaea split into continents and the weight of the water caused some ground to “sink”. Mega tsunamis washed away cities and perhaps technology destroyed(if it existed). Only 8 human beings survived with the animals in the ark that God commanded Noah to build. Today we are a supercivilization with technology and one day we will be destroyed because of our violence and sinfulness.

    Reply
    1. Dave Mowers at |

      Noah’s name is telling in terms of Etymology. Under Sumerian language structure his name is actually a word for a clan as the sound “ah” or “A-A” “aa” is a common Sumerian way of showing descent by doubling a vowel or word to signify a later group or person who is of that original. Unless you literally believe people used to live six hundred years?

      Or did their clan have prominence for said time period as is the custom on the Sumerian King’s list! Suggesting, I am, that No-Ah was Sumerian which would put him on land now covered by water; the Persian Gulf. Which Graham Hancock shows was above water before the flood.

      Reply
  18. Carol at |

    #2 seems about perfect . The picture shown has no bearing whatsoever. Look up “sundaland”, the name of the flooded continent. That Indonesia was once a huge continent sized island is not in dispute. It was covered in water at the end of the ice age. Furthermore, the whole region is volcanically active. It is quite conceivable a land mass already being inundated could have been done in by a tsunami caused by an earthquake or explosion of a volcano such as Krakatao.

    A researcher has written a book on the topic.

    Reply
  19. skyler at |

    im only 16 but this has always amazed me since i was 5 ive always wanted to be the one who uncovers the city of atlantis i hope somebody uncovers it soon

    Reply
  20. John Davis at |

    What about the suggestion that Diodorus’ account of the Atlantians was more reliable than Plato’s? Diodorus places the Atlantians at the base of Mount Atlas in Africa. An island in a nearby lake disappears during an earthquake and the island was populated by the Amazons. It was the latter who challenged the Greeks in Asia Minor and not the Atlantians as Plato has it. Greek mythology supports Diodorus but not Plato. Mount Atlas is consistently in Africa and it is always the Amazons who invade Asia Minor. For more info read Greg Alexander’s “Atlantis, the Origin of a Legend”.

    Reply
    1. Dave Mowers at |

      Explain the red-haired, blue-eyed Guanches the Spaniards exterminated in the Azores. Or the Hindu-Jain concept of the world mountain, Mount Meru in Sumeru; an island kingdom said to be in the center or the earth? If the Indian epics are based on Aryan mythology and therefore Aryan myth is the oldest then Atlantis was just the name of a city in Sumeru; an island kingdom. The Phoenicians trace their ancestry back to the Meropee (Meru-Phe) and they were a sea-faring, port-city series of minor kingdoms that surrounded the Mediterranean and inhabited the major islands containing all the old port cities in the Levant. The Minoans even built a port city on the Red Sea for the Egyptians to conduct trade with India (Punt) called; Peru-Nefter. It was this “Peru” the Spaniards were seeking when they mistranslated the name given them by the Incas for their lands as part of the kingdom of Meru. Mummies in Egypt, Peru and the Azores all Caucasian and all the same method of mummification including as Donnelley shows, the ones found in Nevada.

      “Phe” meaning “the” or “of the” as in singular and Meru being a derivation of the Sumerian and Canaanite AMAR.UTU; as Phe-Roe, Pharaoh is the Royal House or Royal Blood Line. How many coincidences and similarities does it take before people accept the story at face value?

      Reply
  21. James at |

    Diodorus should at least be on the above list. His story is just as interesting, Amazons, lost lands and lakes, etc.

    How advanced was the Atlantis advocated by Plato anyway? His so-called ‘ideal’ society was entirely feudal and run by kings, and he said this in a democratic age.

    Reply
    1. Dave Mowers at |

      Plato’s version doesn’t really detail cultural advances mostly implies architectural, engineering, sea-faring and metallurgy. His description of the social classes existing mirrors the same system described as set up by Hephaestus and Hellene for the proto-Greeks which is identical to the Teutonic and Gaulish social divisions. Being that they all share common origin I suppose that makes sense and why Plato doesn’t focus on it. As far as the Diordorus account Donnelley shows that many different African peoples claimed descent from another kingdom and in fact named mountains and cities after this mythical place. He ties every nation or people that used Merope, Meropis, Meropee, Mero, Meru, Maru, Amaru together as sharing a common worship system of flowers for sacrifice and serpent veneration. This is Sumerian AMAR.UTU the sun God who became Marduk, Merodach and the Biblical Merovach. The Hebrews called them Amorites.

      Reply
  22. Dave Mowers at |

    For more information on Atlantis besides Plato’s account you can find it talked about under various other names that appear to all be cognate; Scheria. Ogygia, Aztlan, Asgard and the Garden of Eden/Aedin/Ogden (valley of the sacred groves). All of these names can be translated back into Sumerian root words from their original alphabetic spelling in their origination languages. I find it improbable that all of these words, when the transliteration is undone back to an original Sumerian root form share four things in common; Stars, Ocean, Serpent and a Garden. All of them and yet these terms are spread across 4,000 years and from America to India. How would Aztecs, Mayans, Phoenicians, Norse, Celtic Druids, Jews, Sumerian, Egyptians, Hindus, Greeks, Etruscans, Irish and Scottish end up with a similar origination tale for mankind containing these exact elements without contact with each other? Why does the Sun God always fight the great serpent and why did every one of these ancient peoples venerate the serpent for it’s wisdom and knowledge?

    Reply
  23. chandrakant marwadi at |

    Anarta / Anatolia / Atlantis

    This forgetfull insensitive world forget Anarta since Kaliyuga ..Even In India..Anarta was remembered u to Dwapara yuga..then most people forget it. Anarta… the story of Sharyati (Son of Manu) remeined forgotten story. now i can understand Atlantis..is ocean of tear…you all are lamenting Anarta..and people forget it. I shall try my level best to remind the people of ancient Anarta….that stretches from Kushsthali..to Crete.

    Sat yuga

    In India it was mentioned as Anarta..but at opposite end the word turned to Anatolia…any word can change after reaching that mush long distance. Anarta was son of Sharyati..(River Saryu named after Sharyati). Sharyati was son of Manu and brother of Ikshvaku..who founded Sunline dynasty.

    Treta yuga

    King of Saurashtra sovira was present at Ayodhya when Dashartha arraned Yagna for Incarnation of shri Ram.

    Dwapara yuga

    14 years before Mahabharata war..shri Krishna came to Anarta from Mathura alongwith Yadavas.

    Kali yuga

    Anarta is forgoten in Kaliyuga..WE people in Bhartwarsha also forget history of Lav nandan (LOndon)…I shall try my level best to spread the real truth…Thanks

    Reply
  24. David M. at |

    As much as people might ‘pooh pooh’ it I think it would behoove them to read up on a man named Edgar Cayce. Known as America’s sleeping prophet he had over 14,000 documented readings. Many of these referred to Atlantis. Nostradamus couldn’t hold a candle to this man when it came to accuracy.

    Reply
  25. Jean C at |

    The true location of Atlantis is known, but only by a few. Today’s version of Plato’s Timeaes Critias is not the same as the orginal. Whoever revised it, wanted to make it sound as if it was Minoan Crete. However they left some small details that the orginal story contained and that is that the Continent contained 10 Kings! Now why would an island the size of Nebraska need ten kings to rule it? The only logical explanation is that the continent was a supercontinent. There is only one location and two continents that fit that description and that is North America and South America. If North America and South America was once one giant land mass, then it’s leaders would have waged war against the rulers of the other giant land mass known at that time as Eurasia. The City of Atlantis existed on one of the peninsulas of North or South America. The peninsula was as large as 77,000 square miles. Today it is not as large as it once was. The area where Atlantis was located contained fruits with hard rinds that could afford drinks according to Plato. This sounds like a coconut. The Continent also experienced winter as well as summer. A tropical island would only have a temperate climate. This Continent had mountains that fell to the sea and plain lands. Again this sounds like North America and South America. If you take a look at a relief map in which the sea level is lowered 200 meters, you can see that Florida would have much more land and make the shape of a rectangle as Plato described it. Plato mentions that the continent of Atlantis had springs with hot and cold water and fountains that shot forth from the ground. Florida has hot and cold springs as well as fountains. Yellowstone National Park has geysers. So what could have happened to cause the disappearance of the civilization of Atlantis? There is an old Chinese creation myth that says that the earth was formed by an egg that cracked open and fell to the Earth. There are other myths that mention that the sky fell. Recently it was discovered that the Earth once had two moons. If something happened to one of those moons, and part of it fell to the Earth, would it have created an event that seemed as if the sky was falling? Would it also have seemed as if an egg in the sky broke open and fell to the Earth? If this event happened it would have caused massive tidal waves to completely swallow continents, as well as pushing the lava flow to create volcanic eruptions all over the world as well as major earthquakes. This is the only event that could have happened that would completely destroy a supercontinent in the time span of a day and night. It would have also caused the sun to be blotted out causing the temperature to drop dramtically and freezing the floodwaters and eventually causing glaciers. If there were surviviors they would have fled the supercontinent for a drier continent and warmer area. The only location for a dry continent at that time, may have been the Middle East and Egypt.

    Reply
  26. Hugh Man at |

    The map of Mu has Atlantis placed in the North Atlantic, so I’m not quite sure if it is indicating that Mu could have been Atlantis.

    Reply
    1. Dave Mowers at |

      “For Sleep is the Bond Forged for Kronos” -Plutarch

      Tell me where Armoria, Amar, Awar, Ahar, Arihia, tell me where this is if not inside the great sea? Ogyges. The place where Sun rests in heaven is the mythical land you seek. We should still follow the sun by journeying outside of our planet. local system and onward throughout our larger system. What kind of “Celt” are you? How can you allow your people to sit and wait when such bounty is to be had out there?

      Forge the bond that will not sleep; become Chronos; you are Kairos!

      Reply

Leave a Reply