Top 10 9/11 Conspiracy Theories

Google+ Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr +

All over the Internet, debate about the true story of 9/11 rages…in chat rooms, on message boards, and on popular sites such as YouTube, people express conflicting opinions, share information, and examine available evidence. This list is not designed to outline the author’s personal viewpoint – rather, it is meant to detail the most common conspiracy theories related to the events of that fateful and tragic day. While the theories listed below may appear to be expressed in the author’s own point of view, they are meant to reflect only the viewpoint of the Truth Movement itself. Nothing printed below is intended to serve as definite evidence of wrongdoing or criminal activity – much of the information included on this list should be regarded as speculation.

10. Prior Events

Strange Events Happening Before 9/11  (Prior Knowledge)

A series of strange happenings in the days and weeks leading up to the 9/11 attacks serve as proof to Truthers that a far-reaching conspiracy was in the works. Some examples of this alleged prior knowledge include: suspicious insider trading and anonymous phone calls warning VIPs not to travel on that day.

Put option contracts on United Airlines stock (which “bet” on a price drop) were in great demand preceding the attacks – clearly, many traders and investors believed that the company’s stock would plummet in value. The same surge in put options were reported for American Airlines, the other company affected by the 9/11 disaster. Many tenants of WTC buildings also saw an increase in trading on the days prior to 9/11 (Merrill Lynch stock registered an incredible 12,215 put options for several days before the attack).

Most notably, former San Francisco mayor Willie Brown received a phone call from someone close to him, warning him not to board an airliner on Sept. 11th, 2001. This warning was somewhat subtle and general – Brown was told that Americans should be careful about flying on that day – but the timing of the warning indicated foreknowledge of a terrorist strike. The message was clear and difficult to misinterpret – someone was trying to protect Brown (propagandamatrix.com, 911blogger.com).

9. The Silverstein Connection

Larry Silverstein, the now infamous real estate developer who purchased a lease on The World Trade Center (through his Silverstein Group) half a year before the 9/11 attacks, is an important figure in the shadowy world of 9/11 conspiracy. The profits he earned from the attacks on these buildings are cited as one reason why suspicion falls on his shoulders – however, there are also other reasons why this man is often at the center of controversy.

When The Silverstein Group purchased the lease on these buildings, Larry Silverstein raved in the press about the profit potential and quality of the buildings. Insiders report that these accounts of the building’s worth were quite inflated. In fact, the buildings were commonly viewed as “money pits” due to the presence of asbestos and the need for extremely expensive upgrades throughout. These troubled buildings, which would have required a cash outlay of 200 million dollars to upgrade, were instead destroyed on 9/11. When Silverstein filed for his insurance payout on the buildings, his profits totaled a reported 7.1 billion dollars.

The plot thickens when Truthers consider the behavior of Silverstein on 9/11. His famous remark, “Pull it”, is viewed as proof that WTC-7 was felled through controlled demolition and not from extensive fire damage, as reported by government agencies. Now, Silverstein has explained his remarks – he has claimed that his comment was a way of saying that rescue personnel should be pulled out of the building for their own safety. Truthers are skeptical – they point to an earlier evacuation of safety personnel – one that Silverstein would likely have been well aware of (keystoburlington.com).

8. The Marvin Bush Connection

The powerful and well-connected Bush family is regarded with derision by Truthers. They point mockingly at former POTUS George W. Bush’s recitation of “My Pet Goat” to schoolchildren during the 9/11 attacks on American soil – in their eyes, Bush seemed to “fiddle while Rome burned”. Their suspicions about Bush’s role in an “inside job” were strengthened when the Truth Movement began to uncover curious connections linking the President’s younger brother, Marvin Bush, with the security of the WTC buildings during the months leading up to Sept. 11, 2001.

In fact, Marvin Bush was an important senior member of a company named Securacom – this firm was responsible for taking care of security at a series of strategic locations, including the World Trade Center, Dulles International Airport, and United Airlines.

On the weekend preceding the attacks, “power downs” in WTC 2 were noticed by staff who worked in the building – these “power downs” were controlled by Securacom, and they deprived the south tower of electricity for a full day and a half (Sept. 8th and 9th, 2001). Due to this power down, no security footage could be filmed at that time, and doors were unlocked. Eyewitnesses report a series of engineers and other newcomers to the building entering and exiting the building during the power down. This loss of electricity and security affected the South Tower from floor 50 up…

For those who believe in a far-reaching conspiracy by the Bush family and their political and business cronies, Marvin Bush’s role in events serves as a red flag. Securacom operated in many key spheres of influence: clients included the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S Air force, and the Department of Justice. (thebirdman.org)

 

7. Operation Northwoods

The notorious false flag operation known as Northwoods is viewed by Truthers as a template for the 9/11 attacks. For those who see the events of that day as an “inside job”, Operation Northwoods serves as damning evidence of the American government’s desire to gain global political advantage by deceiving and harming ordinary citizens.

In 1962, the Northwoods report was issued, and it outlined CIA plans for attacks on American or foreign targets, through the use of bombs or hijackings. The main focus of this plan was a desire to orchestrate attacks on Cuba, and then blame the Cuban government for these acts of terrorism – thereby creating loss of faith by citizens in their current leadership.

A journalist named Jamie Bamford wrote this concise précis of Operation Northwoods in his book, Body of Secrets:

Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war…

(source: Wikipedia)

The Truth Movement considers Operation Northwoods documents as proof positive that the American government is willing to sacrifice innocent life for the sake of political agenda.

 

6. What Happened To Flight 93?

 

The “mystery” of doomed Flight 93 continues to consume members of the Truth

Movement. The official account of this passenger jet’s final flight is terrifying and very sad – while en route from Newark, New Jersey to San Francisco, California the flight was hijacked. Passengers who had learned about attacks on the Pentagon and WTC buildings (from Airfone/cell phone calls placed on board) then confronted the terrorists and attempted to seize control of the cockpit. The altercation between passengers and hijackers resulted in a devastating crash in Somerset County, Pennsylvania – there were no survivors.

Of course, Truthers dispute the official account of events (whatreallyhappened.com). They point to eyewitness accounts that seem to bolster an alternative version of events – one where an American military missile shot down the commercial airliner. Those who believe the missile theory don’t necessarily dispute the decision to intercept – however, they wonder why the government would not own up to its role in the crash of Flight 93. Quotes from politicians and high-ranking military personnel after the event seem to strengthen the theory that this flight did not crash near Shanksville solely due to the passengers storming the cockpit. A quote recorded in a transcript from a trial at Guatanamo: “If they hadn’t shot down the fourth plane [Flight 93] it would’ve hit the dome.” (Q  uote: Stone, a Navy officer. Source: The Brisbane Times.)

 

5. Thermite Was Found On Site At The World Trade Center

Pools of molten metal were rumored to burn at Ground Zero, lending credence to the theory of a controlled demolition, or inside job. Since the temperatures required to melt structural steel into a pool of molten metal are staggeringly high, the presence of thermite is believed to have produced this outcome. When thermite is used to trigger temperatures of 2500 Celsius, molten steel is created due to thermite reaction.

But what is thermite? This substance is defined as a combination of aluminum metal and ferric oxide – it is commonly used in incendiary tools to achieve rapid bursts of extremely high temperatures. Modern compounds known as nanothermites, or super thermites, dramatically increase this incendiary power. These destructive potions can be painted onto steel to get the desired effect. According to Truther Dr. Stephen Jones, evidence of the use of thermites was found in particle dust recovered from Ground Zero.

Truthers believe that high-tech nanothermites were used to weaken steel and reduce the amount of noise produced by more conventional demolition explosives (these would also need to be used to fell the buildings). They argue that the blisteringly hot temperatures created by a thermite signature are the only logical reason for pools of molten steel to exist. These pools (according to eyewitness accounts) were believed to burn for weeks after the tragic events of 9/11.

The idea of thermites being used as a spur to cause the collapse of the WTC buildings was not taken seriously by NIST (National Institute Of Standards And Technologies) a federal agency who studied the event in great detail. In fact, government officials examining the evidence chose not to test the steel for incendiary compounds. “Was the steel tested for explosives or thermite residues? … NIST did not test for the residue of these compounds in the steel” (NIST Responses to FAQs, August 2006).

 

4. Faked Cell Phone Calls

The Cell Phone Calls From Passengers In High-jacked Aircraft Were Faked

The infamous cell phone calls placed by passengers and airline personnel on 9/11 are another bone of contention for the Truth movement. According to studies, cell phone calls at high altitudes (during 2001) were often impossible to make. Whether the recorded calls, such as Todd Beamer’s notorious “Let’s Roll” call (alluding to action against terrorists who had taken over the plane) were faked through voice simulation and other high-tech methods is subject to fierce debate. The vast majority of these phone calls came from Flight 93.

Over time, Truthers pointed to a series of “changed” stories about the origin of cell phone calls from airliners on 9/11 – for example, it is now believed that many of the “impossible” cell phone calls were actually placed from onboard Airfones – however, shifting versions of events have raised suspicions about revisionist history on the part of 9/11 debunkers and insiders.

One key element of the “faked cell phone calls” conspiracy theory is based around a strange conversation between passenger Mark Brigham and his own mother:

M. Brigham: “Mom? This is Mark Brigham. I want you to know that I love you. I’m on a flight from Newark to San Francisco and there are three guys who have taken over the plane and they say they have a bomb.”
Brigham’s mother: “Who are these guys?
M. Brigham: (pause) “You believe me, don’t you?
Brigham’s mother: Yes, Mark. I believe you. But who are these guys?

Truthers are puzzled and dismayed by the caller’s use of his first and last names during a phone call with his own mother. They believe this interaction never really happened, and that it is the result of high-tech voice morphing technology (globalresearch.ca).

3. There Was An Air Defense Stand-Down

 

Following 9/11, the air defense response on that fateful day was subject to immense scrutiny. After all, the United States government and military have a series of responses which are supposed to kick in at the first sign of trouble in the air. The failure of the Pentagon to “scramble” jets and bring down the hijacked planes (especially the second plane to hit the Twin Towers and Flight 77) was difficult to understand. To Truthers, it seemed all too obvious that a stand-down order was in place, and that this order would have had to come from those in very high places (911research.wtc7.net).

Truthers also point to a series of “war games” staged on that day… ones that threw personnel into confusion about what was “real” or “simulated”. The scheduling of these widespread “war games” on 9/11 appeared more than coincidental, in light of the role they played in events. These military exercises made it difficult, if not impossible, for personnel to make the snap decisions that were required to protect Americans (bcrevolution.ca).

The failure of the chain of command on that day was also called into question. Many Truth Movement members view former Vice-President Dick Cheney as the “puppetmaster” who sought to prevent proper air defense support through subterfuge. Truthers point to new legislation that changed prior DOD protocols for actions related to hijacked jets – new rules stipulated that the Secretary of Defense (Donald Rumsfeld) must be the only one authorized to issue intercept orders (the7thfire.com).

2. WCT-7 Was A Controlled Demolition

The near-freefall of WTC-7 raised a series of questions… the building’s destruction was ignored by the 9/11 Commission in its report on the events of that day. This glaring oversight did little to assuage the fears and doubts of Truthers. In terms of physics, the laws of symmetry and asymmetry are important lessons that every student learns… the symmetrical fall of this building seemed to defy science. Videotapes of the building on 9/11 show a structure that was burning, but not consumed by flames – however, other videotapes display different angles and more damage from fire.

Stores of diesel fuel in the building were believed to play a role in the fall of WTC-7 – through the weakening of support beams and the softening of steel. The temperatures that are necessary to heat steel to a failure level are incredibly high – whether the fuel load in the building could have accomplished this is fiercely contested. The building itself was heavily fireproofed, and fires should have burned themselves out (at temperatures too low to affect steel columns and joists) within 30 minutes or less.

It must be stated that a plane did not hit this building; nor was it toppled by an avalanche of debris from the Twin Towers disaster (as is commonly reported).

It took seven years for a report to be issued regarding the scientific reasons for the building’s descent at near free-fall speed – and this report was based on computer modeling, rather than reenactments or real-life tests. Many scientists and architects for Truth believe that a symmetrical fall due to fire alone is a scientific impossibility. They believe that the final NIST report uses inaccurate equations and doctored science to explain the impossible… under the new phenomenon of “thermal expansion”.

In fact, no other steel structures (except the Twin Towers) have ever fallen due to airplane strikes or fire damage alone…

For many, the BBC report which “press released” the fall of WTC-7 while it was still standing serves as more proof of government foreknowledge and global conspiracy (911truth.org).

1. The Pentagon Wasn’t Hit By A Commercial Plane


 

This “smoking gun” is one of the mainstays of the 9/11 Truth Movement. Since passenger jet crashes normally leave a huge wake of destruction – including sheared wings, scorched earth, strewn luggage, and (sadly) bodies and body parts – the scene at the Pentagon crash site raised some serious questions. In fact, many Truthers believe that the Pentagon was hit by a guided missile (or smaller aircraft), and that a “decoy” plane was flown near the Pentagon to provide onlookers with an “eye-witness” visual of the scenario.

 

Truthers argue that the circumference of the Pentagon “hole” was simply too small for the passenger jet’s wide body and wings. The single videotape released by the government adds fuel to the fire. In this video, there is no clear view of a jet crashing into the building – instead, something strikes the Pentagon at a blindingly fast speed. Since the Pentagon is one of the most protected structures in the world, Truthers wonder why there isn’t a clearer, more indisputable record of the crash.

In fact, it’s believed that a different videotape of the moment of impact was confiscated from a nearby gas station (by government agents) immediately after the incident, leading Truthers to suspect an orchestrated “inside job”, or, at the very least, significant foreknowledge of a terrorist strike.

Other issues regarding the crash site include: contrasting accounts from bystanders, “sliced” poles in the aircraft’s flight pattern towards the Pentagon (were they made by the plane, or cut to stage the scene?), and avionics parts at the crash scene which did not appear to match the make and model of airplane…

 

Speedy removal of evidence added to speculation of government foreknowledge

Shop Related Products

or complicity. The fact that the Pentagon was reinforced just before the incident, at the exact location of the crash, seemed suspicious to many. Also, the records stored in the destroyed Pentagon wing were related to a mysterious, trillion-dollar deficit. The fact that potentates such as Donald Rumsfeld were in the Pentagon, but as far away as humanly possible from the crash itself, provoked even more questions from the Truth Movement. (flyingsnail.com)

 


Share.

68 Comments

  1. Good list. I’m more of the opinion that the government knew about the attack in advance and simply let it occur (rather than planning it all themselves), but this was a good and unbiased list. A lot of 9/11 theories are based on ignorance or psuedoscience, but this list pretty much sticks to the facts and let’s the reader decide.

    • There is a lot of info in this top 10 that implies more that they planned it then only knew about it, but with what they give to us you can believe what you want

    • i didnt see hardly any facts here at all. silverstein for one lost billions of dollars. he didnt profit at all. insurance paid out a little over 4 billion and just to rebuild will cost over 9 billion. truthers do believe all of these to be true though so i guess that makes the list accurate in that sense.

        • you dont make anything if the costs are higher then what they paid. it will cost 9 billion to rebuild. insurance paid 4 billion. that would be a negative 4 billion.

        • He’s not RE-building anything. You insurance gives you $1000 for your totaled yugo, you go out and buy a new mercedes, and you’ve “LOST” a lot of money? Oh, and genius George, 4 from 9 is FIVE, the way we do math here.

        • sorry the 4 is right next to the 5. its called a typo.

          but please tell me where you can buy a new mercedes for $1000. lets say a new mercedes cost 50k. now after you deduct the 1k insurance gave you, you are now 49k in the hole. does that make sense to you? probably not. you dont seem very bright.

          your analogy is as bad as your critical thinking.

        • In the words of The Cat In The Hat, “You’re not just wrong, you’re stupid.” 

          Larry Silverstein received $4.577 billion in insurance money from the destruction of the World Trade Center Complex. He tried to get $7.1 billion by stating that the towers being hit by 2 planes meant that he should be entitled to 2 claims against the terrorism clause of his insurance . However, after several court appearances, he was allotted the above figure.

          The cost to rebuild the new 1 World Trade Center building was $3.9 billion. Only $1 billion of which Mr. Silverstein put up from his insurance money. The rest was funded by the state of NY and Port Authority, as they are the owners of the complex and Mr. Silverstein merely held a lease on buildings 1, 2, 4, and 5. That means that he made $3.577 billion on the destruction of the towers. (Granted that number will go down slightly once construction begins on buildings 4 and 5.)

          Building 7 was the only building in the WTC complex that was owned solely by Larry Silverstein. It cost $700 million to rebuild and he owed about $400 million on its mortgage. That comes out to $1.1 billion. He had received $861 million from insurance on the old building and $475 million in Liberty Bonds. If you need help with that, (clearly you aren’t very good at math) that is $1.336 billion. Which means that he had about $236 million leftover after the rebuild of WTC7.

          Are you still with me? Let’s do just a little more math.

          If he has $3.577 billion left over in insurance money from buildings 1, 2, 4, and 5 and $236 million from building 7, that means that he came out $3.813 billion richer than before 9/11.

          Does that sound like he lost money to you? I didn’t think so. So the next time you want to condescend someone and tell them that they “don’t seem very bright”, maybe you should do just a little research, lest you come out looking like the one who isn’t very bright.

        • See this is the problem with conspiracy theorists. They aren’t very bright and they go to a conspiracy website such as infowars or abovetopsecret and think that counts as legitimate research.

          Silverstein only got a total of $4.5 billion out of all the towers. Out of that $4.5 billion he was only allowed to keep 57% of it. The rest had to be paid to the Port Authority. The cost to rebuild the complex is over $8 billion and according to his deal with the Port Authority he still has been paying the $120 million a year in rent since 9/11. That is roughly $1.5 billion he has had to pay for a set of buildings he wasn’t making any money off of until very recently. Your math is absolute garbage but I am not surprised considering where you do your “research”. You are using information that is almost a decade old and lies by omission by failing to mention the rent he still had to pay and that he only got 57% of the insurance money with the rest going to the Port Authority. This is why everyone thinks conspiracy theorists are stupid. You refuse to do adequate research and believe the first article you read that coincides with your preconceived notions of “what really happened”(coincidentally another website you probably get your “research” from).

      • Silverstein was on the hook for the asbestos removal, so he caved a HUGE chunk of change on that alone.

        • please tell me where you can buy a new mercedes for 1000. this is where your logic, or lack thereof, falls apart. lets say a new mercedes costs 50k. now the insurance company gives you 1k for your totaled yugo. now you have to make up the 49k to pay for the rest of the mercedes. your analogy is correct yet your conclusion is wrong. silverstein is going to have to come up with an extra 5 billion that the insurance didn’t cover to rebuild. he isn’t making any money off of this. he is losing 5 billion.

          im assuming by your posts your never graduated high school so i am going to leave it at that.

        • Heavens_Joke on

          I love the fact that’s you think you know me. And I love being lumped into a category, that’s always fun. I don’t know where you are getting your information from but everything from my previous comment was readily available information on the Wikipedia websites of Larry Silverstein and The World Trade Center. Not “conspiracy websites”. And if you will notice, I never claimed even once that he had foreknowledge of the event. I was simply quoting numbers. Sure Wikipedia is not the end all, be all, infallible source for 100% factual information, nothing on the internet is. But it is pretty close and widely recognized as such.

  2. If this were all true and the gov’t knew of this and was 3000 plus people died, then if I were the “Truthers” I would be very afraid. If the gov’t could be so caprice and killed innocent people, then there would be no reason at all for the men in black to show up at their door one day and snuff them out. I think that the military had knowledge of some event happening but didn’t know what.

    I wonder what people think of the ’93 World Trade attack, maybe Clinton knew that it was going to end in failure and didn’t do a thing about it. He was probably too busy in the the oval office, nudge, nudge, wink, wink!

    • Heather Matthews on

      Hypothetically speaking, if this was an “inside job”, it was clearly done for a specific purpose, which was to secure the support of the American people before going to war in the Middle East. Since this goal was attained so rapidly after 9/11, there would no need for men in black to do dirty deeds “door to door”. Thanks for reading the list and leaving a comment.

  3. I liked this list. I do not believe the government was behind it all, I still find it interesting. I do find some of them to be stupidly false and crazy, but most of them are smart.

    • One of the biggest falsehoods is that those planes could take down those buildings in the manner we saw. Structurally speaking, the 1993 attack was more threatening, and you see how that failed. No, these terrorists had some help.

  4. what about the doctored news broadcasts?
    i think that is the most compelling evidence brought forth in the 9/11 conspiracy

    Video: ‘September Clues Part A’

    watch the whole vid and think about what u just saw O_O
    now spread it around

    • no. this was debunked a long time ago. people with the same name as the hijackers were found alive. a couple of the hijackers names are as common in the middle east as a john smith or a mary adams are in the western world.

  5. Heather Matthews on

    Thanks to everyone for the comments. There was a lot to cover here, and there were many others things I could have discussed as well. I made choices and tried to present the information as best I could.

  6. interested_student on

    also, i remember seeing a tv program about this, and one thing they mentioned about the whole pentagon thing was that people recalled seeing a C-130 bomber in the sky above the pentagon immediately following the crash. the government and the pilot (if I recall correctly) said that there had been some suspicious activity with the plane and that they had asked the pilot to investigate, and that was why he was there. regardless, I find this and all of the other evidence compelling and very plausible. Great list!

    • Close, but you wrote Mossad when you meant the Neoconsevatives, and Arab people when you meant anyone they want. Let’s face it, even Israel would have needed inside help.

  7. Stacked Stone Bloke on

    still unsure, however the footage of something hitting the Pentagon is still the most controversial piece of evidence.

      • Dennis Hibbard on

        To whom it concerns:
        Know the saying you can fool some of the people some of the time, you can fool some of the people all the time, but you Can’t fool HYHY ANY TIME, Luciferian Temptations going to Take you Out?
        All is known by the One who Cares, there are No Secrets from the Omniscient One. Think you will find what goes around comes around at more than Double, so far so Good you may be thinking, Really Ecclesiastes 8:11; Romans 12:19; Hebrews 10:30; Who will have the First and Last Word Revelation 20:11,12, Don’f forget Waco and the gov involvement;/ double the Price in Oklahoma by the Gov and still paying! HYHY is no Respecter of Persons.
        WTC came down to Precisely, and #7 wasn’t even Touched. Heat goes Up, and it looked like the fire was almost out, in one of the Towers, guess what down it went Together with the Other, Hummmmmmmmmmmmm

  8. i remember seeing a tv program about this, and one thing they mentioned about the whole pentagon thing was that people recalled seeing a C-130 bomber in the sky above the pentagon immediately following the crash. the government and the pilot (if I recall correctly) said that there had been some suspicious activity with the plane and that they had asked the pilot to investigate, and that was why he was there.

    • Most idiots will say that .
      The government could have taken steps to prevent it – it didnt – and nobody took the rap.

      So keep living in la la land and suffer the consequences that have become the “war on terror” , warts and all. Or look at the undeniable evidence and question it until a transparent investigation that actually asks and answers very important questions.

      Do yourself a favour and read Susan Lindauers book “Extreme Predudice” – when youv’e done that and if you are still of the opinion that the government were not complicit in 911 Ill be very surprised.

    • steve bitterrage on

      Archworf You are a classic example of the “sheep” who refuse to even look at the glaring evidence.I know it’s a scary realization but denying any questions about the event is surly an attitude of STUPIDITY. Its those like you that allow murders to walk free and profit from their horrendous acts. After everyone who was “dirty”and involved are dead and gone, the truth will surface. I hope you live a long life, The truth will come later when the sheep are ready to be told what really happened on 9/11

  9. The man who accused for this tragedy is dead, cheer for it? and stop arguing, or still argue for the sake of prevention of the same “failure of preventing”?
    Honestly, US are very strong and superior, it’s just plain impossible to such thing as destruction of these building to occur, not even World War II can give a scratch to mainland of America, and in 2001 US defense certainly much more stronger than that time.

    • Heather Matthews on

      I’m not sorry when killers pay for their crimes. I would have preferred a trial with evidence, but I think a lot of people feel like that. I’m in favor of questioning things and discussing issues. This sort of discourse or “argument” is necessary to democracy. Thanks for reading the list.

  10. Unless damning evidence is ever brought out that shows the government was behind the attacks, I think these conspiracy theories are ridiculous.

      • Eyeless Dog Pawless Dog Loveless Dog on

        Hi Heather I like your lists and your writing (and you look very gorgeous in your little picture) Could you please tell me where does Katherine Watt (coworker of yours) live? Any information would be useful

        Thanks and good luck. 🙂

    • Unless you can prove plane crashes can change the laws of physics, the government’s “theory” is ludicrous. No, I believe in hard science, not impossibilities,

  11. aaron fleszar on

    Al-Qaeda or “New World Order” controls the story online regarding the 9 11 Conspiracy

    My name is Aaron Fleszar and I’d like to expose, with your help, the largest conspiracy in world history. Most people don’t believe in conspiracies or conspiracy theories, I know because I was one of them. The thing about a conspiracy is it cannot be proven, if it could, it wouldn’t be a conspiracy. I will try and make this as simple as possible so that you can follow my logic and likely reach the same conclusions.

    What do we know about Osama Bin Laden that we haven’t been told by the media? We know that he is a spokesperson for Al-Qaeda. Once or twice a year, this guy appears in video, pointing his finger, from a tape that mysteriously arrives at the Al-Jazeera network. If Osama Bin Laden is only spokesperson, and not a mastermind, who makes up the organization behind him?

    Even a president is only a spokesperson. A president surrounds himself with an administration that advises him. There is always a force behind a president with an agenda. Sometimes that agenda is known, sometimes it’s not.

    Are we being mislead by Osama Bin Laden and the organization behind him? Could Osama be the spokesperson for a New World Order, the richest people in the world who would like to take over the government? Could Osama be a distraction, and a catalyst, for starting an endless war on terror, increasing defense department spending, lining the pockets of defense contractors, and driving up the price of oil?

    Could the attacks on 9/11 be attacks against capitalism? Is Al-Qaeda or New World Order’s goal to destroy capitalism? Would destroying capitalism allow the richest people in the world a chance to implement socialism, get wealthier by collapsing the dollar, and allow them to institute a one world currency, only to enslave the rest of the world to their New World Order government?

    Everyone knows that something happened on 9/11 that is being covered up, but what is it? Is it that planes didn’t collapse 2 buildings which fell with precision as if they were being brought down by a controlled demolition? Is it that no one ever talks about the third building which collapsed that never got hit by an airplane? Were the planes nothing more than misdirection, or an illusion, created by Al-Qaeda/New World Order, also known as “the Illuminati?”

    Written across thousands of get rich quick scams online there is a code. Al-Qaeda or NWO appears to be using the internet to take over all ecommerce and media. Several people making up this code are look a likes for people associated with the current administration, in addition to media moguls, and CEO’s.

    Several of the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists make up this code online. They are wanted for US embassy bombings in Kenya, Obama’s family’s birthplace, and Indonesia, a place where Obama spent many years as a child.

    These are the aliases of Most Wanted Terrorists. Check out Google images;
    Mark Joyner Simpleology-Seif Al Adel (Sarah Palin’s book Palinology)
    John Ferrero-Ramadan Shallah
    Yaro Starak-Umar Patek
    Armand Morin-Noordin M Top (said to have been killed in Indonesia and now removed from the FBI’s most wanted list)
    Michael Filsaime-Ali Sayyid Muhamed Mustafa al-Bakri (Die Hard 4 “Fire Sale” The cyber attack on our infrastructure)
    Dr. Mani Sivasubramanian-Ammar Mansour Bouslim
    Carl Galletti-Ahmed Garbaya, Samir Salwwan
    Ted Ciuba-Abdul Rahman Yasin

    What’s interesting about the Al-Qaeda organization online, that literally own the internet, is that this same group of marketing experts ran the last election on Youtube. Could the organization behind Osama Bin Laden be the New World Order Illuminati? Could the organization behind the election of Obama, be the same group? Could Osama be the look a like to represent Obama, and Biden, Bi(nla)den?

    It’s not a conspiracy when it’s taking place right in front of you. There is just an overwhelming amount of misinformation to try and prevent you from connecting the dots. Keep in mind that the Illuminati, or New World Order, are masters at illusion.

    It’s important for the future of America that you tell others immediately about this information. You can learn more by simply searching my name. Email and text everyone you know. When enough people start demanding honest answers, we will finally learn the truth to what really happened on 9/11.

    Thank you for reading this,
    Aaron M Fleszar

  12. Very well done, Heather. As a security guard who depends on electronic records to know when secured areas are being breached, I’m deeply disturbed by the “power-downs” immediately preceding the attacks. Anything could have been done during this time. For the rest, we know how hot jet fuel burns and we know what temps would have been required to melt the steel in the way it did. Simple truth: jet fuel didn’t cause this.

    • except that the steel didnt melt. aluminum from the plane melted though. at the temps that the jet fuel was burning at steel loses over 50% of it structural strength. more then enough to cause the tube within a tube that the wtc towers were to collapse especially with the big giant holes in them further weakening the structure.

  13. There is a dude I know who lives in Sweden who swears up and down it was an inside job. Him and I have gone back and forth on the subject numerous times. I’ll have to give him the link. Oh yea, the pirate Maddox has a 4 panel cartoon about 9/11. Too many people would have to be in on the secret. As we all know, people love to talk about stuff they are not supposed to talk about.

    And try telling Denis Leary about a conspiracy. He will check you into the boards.

  14. Okay, so what happened to the people who were on flight 77? My cousin was on that plane. If it didn’t hit the pentagon where is she? And everyone else who was on the plane? This is one thing that bothers me about the conspiracy theorists. They don’t answer questions like this. My aunt received body parts from the wreckage. Whose were they?

  15. I cant believe people still believe that 9/11 was carried out how the US goverment told you. If you can be bothered all the information is out there, even on dvds, books etc released by US media groups. Seriously look at it again. Doesnt anybody think it strange that even 10yrs on the US media have been banned from showing footage from that day. Also on Sept 10th Donald Rumsfold announces that the Pentagon cannot account for $4T, then the next day a ‘Plane’ hit the very part all the accounts were kept.

    • i cant believe people still believe the government could have carried this out. the same government that cant keep anything secret has managed to keep this secret without one leak for 10 years? common sense should have kicked in by now.

      plus where did you hear that the us media is banned from showing footage? you can hardly turn on the tv without seeing another special on it with an hour of footage. also the part of the pentagon that was it was under renovation. hardly anything was in there at all much less the records for the “missing” 2 trillion. funny how the number keeps going up isnt it? now it is up to 4 trillion? must be inflation. lol.

      what is amusing is that when rumsfeld said that he was quoting a report from back in 1999. a report that was made public then. this is what happens when you go to conspiracy websites that pick and choose the “facts” that they are going to show you. you get an out of context quote that means nothing. now people like you think this was a new report that came out on 9/10/11 and not the truth that it actually came out in 1999.

      http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=002hxm

      i know you wont read it because you have no intention of ever changing your mind but their is the link talking about the 1999 audit..

  16. Mossad was caught read handed. They exploded at least one truck bomb, tried to explode another on the George Washington bridge. Used other vans to transport explosives. They had in their possession a van with a mural of a plane flying into the twin towers. The were arrested by local police and set free by Bush.

    The zionist group; Project for a New American Century wanted a new Pearl Harbor to bring to fruition their plans of global war.

    Doesn’t take much to work out what happened.

  17. Termite? There was no thermite…
    But the planes WERE filled with that chemical that causes mind-control chemtrails though and THAT stuff burns hot enough to melt steel.

  18. Ever since the Blackhawk helicopters were shot down in Mogadishu or the USS Cole was attacked, it has been Sunni jihadist that were responsible. And these “Old men of the Mountain terrorist were supported and armed by the royal princes and sheiks of Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Pakistan. The attacks on New York on 9-11 and the atrocities committed in Africa, India , Iraq and Libya were all done by groups like Al Qaeda.

    The American media, influenced by Jewish plutocrats, wants to promote a “yellow Press” journalism campaign that is very similar to how William Randolph Hearst agitated for a war against Spain in 1898. The Spanish were accused of atrocities, and this was the pretext used to confiscate many of the Spanish colonies. Later in the early 1900’s the Jewish plutocratic cabal that instituted the privately-owned Federal Reserve Bank used Bernays and Woodrow Wilson to start a similar propaganda campaign against Kaiser Wilhelm’s Germany. Though Germany, like Iran today, did no harm to America, the wealthy Zionist disciples of Theodor Herzl insisted America aid England in World War II so that England could wrest Palestine from turkey and make it an independent Jewish state. This was America’s contribution of gentile blood and money to the Balfor Agreement of 1917.

    We see a nuclear armed Pakistan, a nation rife with Sunni jihadist who are out to murder Indians and even many of their own countrymen. Pakistan is allying with China to build a submarine base to attack the Seventh fleet and shut of oil from the Persian Gulf. Pakistan is using Chinese engineers and technology to build three more nuclear power stations, and have a source of fissile nuclear material. Pakistan is also harboring the terrorist who attack American troops in Afghanistan and Indian troops in the south.

    Yet America seems to be under he spell of some unholy alliance. America acts as a vassal to Tel Aviv with their AIPAC funded politicians who willingly implement Israeli designs for Iran. The Saudis and Qataris, who supply much of the oil to America have made the progressive politicians their personal Janissaries, aiding these sheiks in their efforts to re-establish the Sunni empire of Suleiman the Magnificent. There is alliance of Zionist plutocrats, Sunni oil sheiks and their indebted, progressive Western politicians who need money for their socialist Potemkin Village. As a wise proverb says, “The borrower is the servant to the lender”. The US and European politicians have betrayed their citizens, forcing them to cosign a loan called the national debt and forcing heir citizens to comply with the terms, conditions and pledges of collateral. It seems as if one of the terms of this alliance is the destruction, eradication or enslavement of Christians and those who practice Shia. This is compatible with the goals of the globalist Marxist and those of the sheiks of Qatar and Saudi Arabia. What we see is the destruction of every rival to Riyadh and the chaos brought to every nation with a Shia leader. Once vibrant countries like Iraq and Libya are now ruled by savage warlords of various Sunni terrorist sects. And these warlords exist on the money and arms that the Saudis give them or through the arms and money America channels to them through their friends in Syria . (This despite the fact that it was their Syrian free army friends who killed their ambassador at Benghazi.)

    This is just a letter to know not all Americans support this tacit war on all Christians, Hindus and Shia throughout the world.

  19. weeks of drilling and setting explosives to bring down a building. which would have not gone un-noticed, there would have been visible ignition wires laying everywhere. Was not a planned,

  20. Heavens_Joke: See this is why people think conspiracy theorists aren’t very bright. You do all of your “research” on websites like infowars and abovetopsecret and you end up with decades old info that is no longer correct or relevant. Silverstein got a grand total of $4.6 billion and that is only if you count the money insurance companies are still fighting to not pay out. See the insurance policy wasn’t even finalized when 9/11 happened. Silverstein wanted to only insure the complex for $1.5 billion but his lenders wouldn’t let him. He ended up insuring it for the minimum they would let him which was $3.5 billion. Does that sound like someone who knew about it ahead of time and was trying to make money? Of course not. Also the entire time the buildings were destroyed until they had paying tenants, he was still required to pay the Port Authority $120 million a year in rent. That was in their lease agreement. Funny how you failed to calculate that extra $1.5 billion in rent in your calculations. Also per their agreement he only gets to keep 57% of the insurance money. The rest goes to the Port Authority as well. Also he hasn’t received a dime of the bonds yet because none of it has been released. Also he only received 60% of the Liberty bonds which means over the life of the 80 years left in the lease he will only make $3-$4 billion. He won’t see that of course because he isn’t immortal and would be dust by then. His interest payments are currently killing him considering he has only received around $400 million of the insurance money and has had to borrow for the rest. Over half of the buildings for site are on hold because Silverstein can’t come up with the funds to finish them.

    This is the problem when you do your research at conspiracy websites. You get straight out false information as well as irrelevant, misleading, and lying by omission information. You obviously fall under the category of “not very bright” for your reliance on conspiracy websites to tell you the truth.

  21. Heather Matthews on

    thanks for posting these facts, they are thought-provoking…and thank you for reading the list.

Leave A Reply