Top 10 Disturbing Paintings Of Modern Historical Atrocities

13

Before the invention of photography, mankind recorded its most frightening historical events via paintings. Such paintings often romanticized struggles, or else presented the scenes in distorted ways, to further convey the terror experienced at the time by our ancestors. This list features the ten most disturbing paintings that depict historical atrocities and disasters from the past 450 years or so. While not photographs, these haunting images nevertheless effectively capture the sheer horror of the events that occurred so many years ago.

10. The Massacre of the Innocents (c. 1565-1567) by Pieter Bruegel the Elder

masacre-of-the-innocents

Bruegel, a Flemish painter of the Renaissance, based this painting on the Biblical story of Herod the Great’s failed preemptive infanticide strike, to prevent the newborn Jesus from eventually taking his throne. Now of course, Herod did not have an army of mounted pike men. Nor do we usually think of the Holy Land as being snow covered. In fact, the scene actually, despite its title, appears to be set in the Netherlands, which was on the eve of a great revolt against Spanish rule that lasted eighty years (1568 to 1648). Thus, for Bruegel, his fellow Dutch-speaking Flemings are modern “innocents,” while Philip II of Spain is a new tyrant in the manner of Herod.

In any case, there is something eerie about the impending dread of the armed soldiers in black about to do “something” to the panicky civilians in the foreground. The image thus serves as a good foreboding of things to come.

9. The Saint Bartholomew’s Day Massacre (ca. 1572-84) by François Dubois

st-batholemews-day-massacre

At the same time the Dutch Protestants battled against Spanish Catholics, so too did Protestants and Catholics clash in France. Dubois’s chaotic painting depicts the massacre by French Catholics of French Protestants in Paris, and the countryside that occurred on St. Bartholomew’s Day in 1572. Anywhere from 5,000 to 30,000 people were slaughtered in the massacre, which was only the most notorious of the violent French Wars of Religion (1562–1598).

8. The Execution of Charles I (1649) by John Weesop

execution-of-charles-I

Just one year after the Thirty Years’ War ended in 1648, an English king was executed for, among other things, his seemingly Catholic-esque religious practices. The bloody scene of King Charles’s beheading causes the lady in the foreground to faint. What makes the scene especially terrifying, is what it meant for European monarchs. It let them know that they too could be subject to execution if they did not cooperate with their people. The picture above shows just how bad the consequences were for his actions. It also provided a grim foreshadowing of things to come, as Charles would not be the last European monarch to suffer such a fate. Indeed, for as bloody as the English Revolution was, the French Revolution of the next century would be far, far worse.

7. The Death of Marat (1793) by Jacques-Louis David

the-death-of-marat

You most likely have seen this image in textbooks when you get to the section about French Revolution. Marat, the so-called “friend of the people,” was actually a blood-thirsty revolutionary. To stop him, the so-called “angel of assassination” Charlotte Corday, decided to murder him. Marat had a painful skin condition that caused him to spend massive amounts of time bathing. So, Corday claimed she had knowledge of a plot against the revolutionary government to share with Marat. Marat agreed to see her while taking one of his many bathes. It was a fatal decision, as she stabbed him with a knife that cut into his lung, aorta, and heart.

6. Bonaparte Visits the Plague Stricken in Jaffa (1804) by Antoine-Jean Gros

bonaparte-plague-striken

For Napoleon, if fighting against the Ottomans and British in the Middle East was not bad enough, he also had to contend with a demoralizing outbreak of bubonic plague. This painting shows Napoleon trying to brave the disease, so as to inspire his grotesquely suffering troops. This particular campaign did not end well for the French, as Napoleon ultimately abandoned his army, and returned to France. In this painting, the French soldiers are clearly the victims. In other scenes of the era, however, they are hardly depicted in such a sympathetic light.

5. The Third of May 1808 (1814) by Francisco Goya

third-of-may-1808

Unlike the English Revolution, the French Revolution dragged on and so multiple changes of government. Eventually, Napoleon seized power and became Emperor of the French. He also placed his brother on the throne of Spain. Not surprisingly, Spaniards were not enthusiastic about a foreign occupation, and so resisted the French invasion. The above image shows an unarmed, Christ-like Spaniard being gunned down with fellow civilians by French soldiers, who almost resemble storm troopers.

4. The Raft of the Medusa (1818–1819) by Théodore Géricault

raft-of-medusa

In 1816, a French ship, headed for a French colony in Africa, ran aground off the African coast. Stranded and desperate, the crew quickly constructed a raft out of parts of the ship Medusa. While the well-off passengers escaped on lifeboats, 147 others boarded the raft to be towed by ropes from the lifeboats, toward the shore. As the people on the raft grew restless, those on the lifeboats let the raft lift. It then drifted in the Atlantic Ocean for thirteen days. When another ship came upon the raft to rescue the survivors, only fifteen out of 147 remained alive, the others having perished in various fashions, with some apparently having been cannibalized.

Two survivors wrote a stirring account of their experiences, which encouraged Géricault to depict the moment of the raft’s rescue. The painter even visited corpses at a morgue, to make sure his painting accurately showed human death. If nothing else, this particular painting shows us that violence and bloodshed can be committed by humans, even in times of relative peace.

3. Souvenir of Civil War (1848) by Ernest Meissonier

souvenir-of-civil-war

Meissonier’s work went beyond scenes of the First French Empire, to depict events more contemporaneous with his own life. This particular painting provides a snapshot of events that occurred halfway through the artist’s life. Meissonier served as a national guardsman during the Revolution, and personally fought against the rebels at the barricade in the scene he immortalized above.  The painting essentially serves as a warning about the human cost of civil war, a lesson that would sadly be taught again and again in European and world history.

2. Explosion (1917) by George Grosz

explosion-grosz

German artist Grosz volunteered for World War I duty in 1914, and was discharged in 1915 after being hospitalized for sinusitis. As such, he lived in Germany during the catastrophic war, that resulted in the loss and destruction of millions of German lives. Not only did he paint the apocalyptic portrait of a fiery explosion, capturing the sentiments of disillusionment felt by many in the fourth year of the war, he continued his protests in other forms, even after the War concluded. He was arrested for participating in the Spartacist Uprising of January 1919, fined for insulting the army in 1921, and he left Germany in the early 1930’s to avoid living under the Nazis. He moved to America and, from there, learned of the new wave of horrors experienced by Europeans, at the hands of dictators in Italy, Spain, and Germany.

1. Guernica (1937) by Pablo Picasso

guernica

Roughly half a million people lost their lives in the Spanish Civil War, from 1936 to 1939. Pablo Picasso’s painting depicts the horror of German and Italian planes bombing a Spanish city in 1937. Hitler and Mussolini had come to the assistance of fellow dictator Francisco Franco, which allowed Franco to win the war, and Hitler and Mussolini to test out their weapons, prior to World War II. This poignant example of cubism shows men and animals alike, in a distorted and bizarre scene of agony and terror. The painting is one of Picasso’s most well-known, and frequently appears in art and history textbooks alike. The painting serves as a reminder that the struggle against Fascism and Nazism actually began well before World War II officially commenced in 1939.

By Dr. Matthew D. Zarzeczny, who has also written Banned From The Internet.


Share.

13 Comments

  1. Also a “great” painting on horrific death, see the wiki page about “De Gebroeders De Witt”. (The De Witt Brothers) At the bottom you´ll find the haunting painting of their quartered and drwan upsidedown hanging corpsen. They were lynched by an angry mob.
    nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moord_op_de_gebroeders_De_Witt

  2. Louis Alexandre Simard on

    Guernica is for me the most beautiful and poignant painting in history. I always prevent to the way the candle held by women coming in from the door/window and shedding light on atrocities. While the electric light on the ceiling doesn’t show nothing. The purity of a flame holds more power than modern technology. And this is just one of the many little details I get from this painting. Others might see something else. That’s what makes art so beautiful and essential.

  3. Dr. Kevorkian had several brutal paintings depicting the genocide of Armenians committed by Turkey. During media coverage of his compassionate killings, it was used by the media to illustrate that the kindly doctor was psychotic. In fact, he was depicting his pain, his parent’s pain and that of the Armenian nation. And since the title of this segment is “modern”, what’s more modern than Dr. Kevorkian’s paintings done a decade or so ago, rather than the ones from the 15th century paintings.

  4. You can certainly see how the style of painting changes through the decades. The painting of bloody massacre really accurately depicts how surreal the event was. The execution of Charles I is my favorite because you see the executioner holding the head and a woman in the crowd that has fainted. In the later decades we see the styles of Picasso that really makes the observer study what is going on in the scene of the painting. Love these artworks !

  5. This was a very interesting article! Seeing the way that all these artists depicted the atrocities reminds me of the images that were used later on to gain support for anti-war movements. In class we discussed the student protests during Vietnam and other happenings of the 1960s. Even though mass anti-war movements did not exist during the atrocities on this list, these images show that the atrocities still affected the public. It is always interesting to look at a painting that generates emotion beyond simply being told what happened in history. I am also intrigued by Picasso’s Guernica. My favorite song is actually Guernica by Brand New. I would be curious to know why the band chose this particular name for their song.

  6. Ryan Winchell on

    The majority of these disturbing historical paintings provide a clear picture of how bloody and gruesome the events actually were. The Execution of Charles I by John Weesop is my favorite painting among the list because it depicts the impact of the gory event where the English king’s detached head is being held high for the horrified audience to see, especially the terrifed woman fainting to the ground.

    -Ryan W.

  7. I find these historical paintings to be quite disturbing yet interesting at the same time. The detail in the pictures give the viewer a realistic idea of how dramatic, terrifying, and bloody these dark actions were.

    Lindsay B.

  8. I really enjoyed these “disturbing” paintings. I love art and I find the meaning behind paintings to be fascinating. These pictures are extremely detailed and show true depth behind what was going on at the time. They also portray the horror of the time as well as the heros that tried to defend themselves.

Leave A Reply