110 Responses

  1. 5minutes at |

    Detroit should be #1.

    Reply
    1. Rob at |

      Care to support that argument?

      Reply
      1. nancy McLernon at |

        Detroit, is the heart and soul of the civil rights movement,Motown voices and friendships living on the same streets.The strong proud auto workers. The magnificent Detroit Institute Of Art, the historic homes and buildings, Belle Isle and Canada a bridge away. Best of all the diversity of the city and the optimism fueling it’s repair after years of opporrtunism ,theft, unethical activity in city government. People in the city and outlying areas are sick of the thug like mentality and lies from city aristocrats, and are coming together to help repair what the millions of dollars looted from the city could have repaired and taken care of years ago.

        Reply
        1. TellItLikeItIs at |

          Detroit is a ****hole, and everyone knows that. If it’s still in a state of recovery and repair, why should it be #1? You yourself state the prevalence of the “thug” mentality and millions of dollars looted from the city … ask anyone from Europe whether they’d rather visit New York City or … Detroit. If they’ve even heard of it. And no, I don’t live there, I live closer to Los Angeles.

          Reply
    2. 5minutes at |

      Actually, no, I don’t. I misread the title as “American Downturns”. (sheepish grin)

      Reply
      1. Rob at |

        Well, it’s making a comeback, right?

        Reply
        1. 5minutes at |

          It’s not hard to make a comeback from “bottom of the barrel”.

          Reply
          1. Fernando at |

            Apparently it’s also easy to kick someone when they’re down.

            Don’t underestimate Detroit. I’m from Milwaukee. We were given up for dead too, about twenty years ago. The Midwest is still alive, and thriving, actually.

            Reply
            1. 5minutes at |

              The Midwest is thriving. Detroit is floundering and has been for a long time. The trend for that city doesn’t show anything but continued decline. It’s going to take a major shift in leadership in the political and business community for Detroit to get anywhere near where it once was.

        2. 313 respresenter at |

          Detroit is making a comeback… hey If you never been there or son’t know whats really going on in Detroit.

          Reply
          1. Rob at |

            Hey 313, take a deep breath. How did you interpret my comment negatively?

            Reply
          2. 517 at |

            I totally agree with 313, and disagree with 5minutes. Our organization is involved in a lot of the great things going on Detroit and has helped win grants for future projects as well. We recently took a tour of downtown Detroit with D-Hive and were impressed at the new projects and interest. If you want to read a great analysis of the problems Detroit has faced, here’s a great article:

            http://www.freep.com/interactive/article/20130915/NEWS01/130801004/Detroit-Bankruptcy-history-1950-debt-pension-revenue

            Reply
        3. 313 representer at |

          that wasn’t directed toward you Rob…. that was for 5minutes….

          Reply
    3. Steve at |

      It’s a miracle! …………..I wouldn’t visit let alone live in any one of them.
      Let’s get real!

      Reply
      1. Tim L at |

        Well it’s OK we don’t need hicks like you. Stay on your farm

        Reply
    4. MDP at |

      Wow….I’ll assume you are a homer and are just supporting the city.

      Reply
  2. Simon at |

    What about Las Vegas?

    Reply
    1. Rob at |

      It’s fake.

      Reply
  3. Michael at |

    Downtown Miami and Miami Beach are not the same place!

    Reply
    1. Michael at |

      Just to clarify –> the picture for downtown Miami is actually Miami Beach, and not downtown Miami.

      Reply
  4. Rob at |

    I understand the historical significance of D.C., but it should not be ahead of Chicago on this list. In fact, I don’t even think I would have placed it on this list; it’s ‘downtown’ area is not like any other on the list.

    #1 NYC – beats Chicago by sheer size.
    #2 Chicago – beautiful skyline, lives up to its motto “Urbs in Horto” (City in a Garden) with all the green space, the lake and the river juxtaposed with that skyline.
    #3 Seattle – again, beautiful skyline, this time juxtaposed with the mountain backdrop.

    Reply
    1. MDP at |

      I grew up in Detroit. Made numerous weekend trips to Chicago, and now currently live in DC. NYC is definitely no. 1. You could make a case for either Chicago or DC being 2 and 3, respectively, but D.Cs. downtown wins. The restaurants and nightlife rival Chicago’s scene, but it’s the number of overall activities, free museums, etc. that tip the scale in DCs favor.

      Reply
      1. DallasTen at |

        I would agree that DC should be somewhat ahead of Chicago. One could also make a case for SF at #2 or #3.

        The only ranking that cannot be debated is NYC at #1.

        Reply
    2. Nicholas at |

      You sound like you’re pretty biased towards Chicago.. I like Chicago plenty but I think it’s actually a little too high on this list. Downtown San Francisco is far more interesting than Chicago.. the same holds true for Boston. I would put Chicago at 5.

      Reply
      1. Rob at |

        You, like all of us, are entitled to your opinion, and entitled to tell us what that is.

        Having said that, I think that other than NYC, there is no city in the United States with the cultural pedigree that Chicago has. If you don’t know, look at this:

        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_museums_and_cultural_institutions_in_Chicago

        I’ve lived in Chicagoland (as we call it) for 26 years and still haven’t exhausted all that the city has to offer.

        Why do we Chicagoans chirp so loudly? Because we have something to chirp about.

        Reply
        1. Denver10 at |

          I would argue that Chicagoans “chirp so loudly” because they have something of an inferiority complex, and feel a bit neglected in the Midwest. Chicago isn’t in a very desirable location, and this hurts its relative status. People want to live in NYC or California, not between Gary and Peoria.

          IMO, Chicago is Top 5, but no higher. NYC absolutely destroys Chicago, and SF, Boston, and DC top Chicago.

          Reply
          1. DeToddi at |

            Dude, you’re from Denver. SMH. You shouldn’t even be allowed to comment. NYC should be number 1. But Chicago is clearly a close 2nd. Followed by Beantown and Philly. Each of the cities are soooo much better than Denver.

            Reply
          2. Northside Neuman at |

            I think someone dropped you on your head Denverboy…

            Chicago isn’t in a desirable location?

            You mean on the shores of one of the largest fresh water lakes in the World. That has the largest municipal harbor systems in the United States allowing for boat moorings for over 6,000 recreational sailing & motor slips. A geographical location that connects the two most important waterways in the U.S. the St. Lawrence Seaway and the Mississippi River. Not to mention Chicago is the transportation nexis of the Western Hemisphere. Every major road, railway, airplane, pipeline and freight carrying cargo ship passes through Chicago moving East to West or North to South from the coasts or from the Gulf up to Canada. Chicago is also the nexis for the United States fiber optic data systems, which is why the region is the fastest growing market for data storage facilities in the country.

            Only New York and Chicago compete in regards to architecture and as financial centers. Only the Smithsonian Campus in Washington D.C. can best the size of Chicago’s cultural collections on display along Grant Park and the Museum Campus.

            Chicago’s Central Business District added over 50,000 residents over the past decade, not even Manhatten can make that claim….

            Reply
            1. KZoo at |

              Northside Newman, your Chicago bias is showing.

              The Rustbelt is NOT a desirable area. Cleveland, Buffalo, Detroit and others are also on Great Lakes or their tributaries, yet no one would claim that Cleveland was super desirable relative to, say, NYC or SF just because it’s on Lake Erie.

              Chicago has very low home prices, very low home price appreciation over time, and very high vacancies.

              Chicago has the second worst unemployment rate in the nation, and the second worst population loss in the nation, after Detroit. Chicago has a very weak economy and poor fundamentals.

              I have no idea what you’re talking about re. population gains. First, it’s irrelevant to relative desirability (places like Wyoming and North Dakota have extremely high proportional population gains relative to, say, California, yet no one would claim WY is more desirable than CA), and second, you’re wrong re. stats. Manhattan gained over 100,000 in the last decade, Chicago lost over 200,000 in the last decade. Not sure how loss of 200,000 is greater than gain of 100,000.

              Chicago also is in no way comparable to NYC in terms of finance, architecture or museums. They’re on two totally different levels. Chicago is not a financial power outside of derivatives, and has no globally recognized museums like Met, MOMA or Smithsonian.

              Chicago does have a great skyline though, and an attractive downtown. It’s clearly the #2 skyline in the U.S., with #3 nowhere close to Chicago. It probably has the #2 downtown in the U.S., though DC and SF are in the same general weight class.

      2. Fernando at |

        I disagree. As an urban planner, I have WAY more fun following Chicago’s development than I ever will following San Francisco’s. They’re different creatures, with totally different strengths and weaknesses. Chicago has several problems, no doubt. But San Francisco has huge problems which are routinely soft-pedaled by the coast-heavy media.

        Homelessness, absurd disparities in wealth, rents and property values that are insanely high, earthquakes, etc.

        And Chicago has severe racial and ethnic discrimination, an incomplete transit system (though maturing far more quickly than SF’s, a ridiculous homicide rate, a dirty political environment, etc).

        It’s like comparing paintings. Both cities are world capitals, in their own rights. Chicago is the capital of the American Midwest, and of the Great Lakes. San Francisco is a Pacific Gem.

        Reply
  5. Rob at |

    OK, I’m exposing myself as a proud Chicago-area resident here, but this website: http://www.diserio.com/top15-skylines.html has Chicago as #2 in the world behind only Hong Kong.

    Not saying that list is better than this one, but it is definitely larger and uses a more defined methodology, which it explains. It’s interesting to read if you liked this list.

    Reply
    1. DallasTen at |

      Honestly, the ranking you posted is silly. Skylines have nothing to do with the quality of a downtown. Paris has no skyline, but arguably the most beautiful core on earth.

      Reply
    2. Nicholas at |

      Why is it that people from Chicago always have delusions of grandeur about their city. While it’s a very nice city in many aspects, there are far more interesting cities in America– namely NYC, San Francisco and Boston, to name a few. Chicago is definitely in the top 5 in America but if you are talking about the global level.. sorry.. Chicago is not even in the top 10 and probably not in the top 20 most beautiful cities in the world.

      Reply
  6. chris at |

    Lived all of my life in the Seattle are and I had never heard of Parsons Gardens.

    Reply
  7. Rick at |

    I like the list and yes, Detroit should be on there. A little surprised that Boston is not.

    Reply
    1. Rob at |

      See #7

      Reply
      1. MDP at |

        Umm….glance at the list one more time.

        Reply
        1. Rob at |

          Don’t know what internet you’re looking at, but on mine, #7 is Boston. The picture is of a neighborhood street lined with brownstones, but it’s Boston.

          Reply
  8. MDP at |

    I think I agree with the list, with the exception of Detroit and Milwaukee, and I grew up in Detroit until moving to DC four years ago. Metro Detroit’s urban sprawl and the lack of any legitimate public transportation system downtown (the people mover doesn’t count) is the very reason as to why the downtown is NOT the center of employment in the greater metro area. Also, “you can’t forget the legendary automobile manufacturing meccas of Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler, the original symbols of 20th century American innovation,” <—— Neither Ford nor Chrysler are even located in downtown Detroit. Ford is located Dearborn and Chrysler-Fiat is located in Auburn Hills.

    You could easily replace either Detroit or Milwaukee with either Dallas or San Antonio. Actually, you could probably replace both Detroit and Milwaukee with Dallas and San Antonio.

    Reply
    1. DGKinNYC at |

      The list is correct, at least w/regard to Milwaukee, a surprising array of architecture, museums, and very pedestrian friendly. Dallas & San An (w/exception of River Walk) big, sterile towers connecting nothing, but corporations.

      Reply
    2. Geri R at |

      Sorry MDP, but I have to disagree with your comment about Dallas & San Antonio replacing Milwaukee. I lived in Downtown Milwaukee for 15+ years, moved to San Francisco 3 years ago and now reside just blocks away from the San Antonio River Walk. Although San Antonio has wonderful people and a rich culture, it does not have a vibrant livable downtown for locals, and I’m afraid that the Texas sprawl mentality will keep it from becoming the local gem that it should be. Milwaukee has many residential options along with services that are essential for daily living, such as two grocery stores. (San Antonio cannot support even one grocery story in its downtown). You will also find all kinds of successful neighborhoods that surround Milwaukee’s downtown area, and every one of them has services and businesses that make them unique. Now, if only the Wisconsin weather would improve……

      Reply
      1. Mike at |

        San Antonio has more residents downtown than Milwaukee, plus the Riverwalk has been expanded and developed with the new museum reach. The residents you are talking about for Milwaukee are not in the downtown core of millwaukee but outside the downtown area. San Antonio has hundreds of restaurants, clubs, galleries, and is much more lively than Milwaukee. SA has many new areas that are being redeveloped hemisfair park, the Pearl district, new electric street cars. San Antonio does has several grocery stores in the downtown area, they are small scale but they are scattered around downtown and have delivery service. The city also has a large bike share program with 20 downtown stations. Milwaukee does not. San Antonio, Austin, Portland, New Orleans, San Diego, Baltimore should be listed above Millwaukee.

        Reply
        1. Geri R at |

          Mike,

          We could go round and round on this issue as to what constitutes downtown areas of Milwaukee and San Antonio. As a matter of reference, I am using zip code 53202 for Milwaukee and zip code 78205 as the main downtown area for San Antonio. If you go to City-data.com and plug in the above two zip codes the stats will show that there are many more housing units in downtown Milwaukee.

          We all have our personal opinions on what we value in a downtown area and what makes a livable city and I guess we’ll have to agree to disagree!

          Reply
          1. Mike at |

            San Antonio’s downtown covers several zip codes. San Antonio has a lot of historical conversions rather than all new construction. It does have many new construction projects underway though.

            Reply
        2. Nicholas at |

          “San Antonio has more residents downtown than Milwaukee”

          List your sources. I think you are wrong on this one. Downtown Milwaukee is one of the more densely populated downtowns among similarly sized cities. Thousands upon thousands of condos and apartments have been added downtown and near downtown Milwaukee over the last 15 years alone. I know this is not a trend unique to Milwaukee, however it is a trend that continued far longer than in other cities across America. Nothing in Texas belongs on this list except for maybe Austin. Dallas and Houston are horrendous sprawling nightmares with no character whatsoever.

          Reply
    3. Detroitgrl at |

      Actually Detroit is the center for employment in this area. Outside of the Big Three downtown Detroit host a sizable number fortune 500 companies. Finance is big industry in Detroit for instance and downtown Detroit has Ernst & Young, Deloitte etc. Also many people in the Metro area work for the city or wayne county, which is also downtown. And within the past couple of years with more and more companies relocating downtown from the burbs, Detroit is still the center of employement for the Metro area

      Reply
    4. krock1dk at |

      Actually, I think you could replace Detroit with pretty much ANY city.

      Reply
    5. Megan at |

      Detroit is on there for the gorgeous buildings. It’s up there with South Beach when it comes to beautiful Art Deco architecture. Next time you’re in the D try actually looking, You will see beautiful details in stonework and tiles along with vaulted ceilings.

      Reply
  9. Lisa at |

    I can’t believe Detroit was even listed. I live & work here. The crime is unbelievable. I wouldn’t walk anywhere alone & I know the city. There is no shopping or public transportation. Terrible place for visitors. I have actually never met one person that has just “come to Detroit for the weekend” like the other cities. People only come to Detroit for a reason that makes them come- usually work related & then they go to the suburbs anyways!

    Reply
    1. DocBlue at |

      I live in the historical downtown district of Detroit. Read what they said it was ranked based on archictectual significance. You dont appreciate fine architecture then thats you. But there are those that appreciate great architecture abbuted next to the Detroit River. So many things to do here too!
      By the way I have been all over the world and I have never been in a major city without crime. So dont exaggerate.

      Reply
    2. Detroitgrl at |

      where do you work? I willing to bet its not really in Detroit. You’re probably one of those suburbanites that don’t cross 8 Mile. While yes there are no chain stores, there is shopping in dowotown. Do you research as well, dowtown crime is comparable to any other city. Terrible place for visitors? please fill in those who come from all over the world for the many festivals that downtown Detroit hosts. DEMF, International Auto Show, Jazz Festival, The Hoedown etc are just a few that millions of people go to every year. Matter of fact DEMF is the biggest techno/house festival. And also don’t forget that Comerica, Joe Louis and Ford Field are downtown, many restaurants and bars, great theatres, the riverwalk etc.

      Reply
      1. Evan at |

        THANK YOU. Detroit Institute of Arts, Detroit Historical Museum, Science Center, Wayne State facilities (granted these are technically Midtown), don’t forget Eastern Market too! Dequindre cut!

        Reply
  10. Josh at |

    The ONLY way you can comment on this list is if you have been to these cities- and if you have, then make your own list. No need to bash Detroit because it is easy to do. Yes, Detroit has some issues, but if you spend time there (as I often do) you will realize what it has to offer. Detroit isn’t just coming back it IS back, and getting better each day. Look for Detroit to move up this list each year.

    Reply
    1. krock1dk at |

      No, not quite. Downtown Detroit itself is definately better than it used to be, but the rest of the city itself is a lifeftime away from being resurrected. My gosh, 40% of the city is abandoned or burned out.That is a fact. Doesnt sound like its ‘back’ to me in the least. Besides, people dont move into a city because it allegedly has a good downtown. Its the rest of the city that matters, and thats where Detroit fails miserably.

      Reply
      1. downtown chatt resident at |

        Some people do locate to a city for its good downtown. If one lives, works, and has all daily needs downtown, there is no reason to leave.

        Reply
  11. Evan at |

    As a college student, I am there AT LEAST weekly. So many things to do. Yes, crime is outrageous in other parts of Detroit. We’re discussing Downtown!

    Reply
  12. George at |

    Wow, I can’t believe downtown San Diego did not make this list because it certainly has a lot going for it. First off, San Diego’s downtown core is very walkable, but it also has good mass transit, serviced by bus, trolley and trains. Plenty of dining/entertainment options in the Gaslamp District and Little Italy. Shopping in and around Horton Plaza. Housing ranges from low rise apartment buildings to townhouses to lofts to high rises with spectacular views of San Diego Bay and the Pacific Ocean. The vast majority of downtown SD is very clean and safe. Balboa Park (1400 acres) is one largest and most beautiful urban parks in the country. The Padres play downtown at Petco Park. The Convention Center hosts Comic-Con and many other huge conventions. Coronado Island and a huge beach beach is a 15 minute drive or ferry ride away. Oh yeah, the weather, 60′s and 70′s year around with plenty of sun.

    I’ve visited many of the cities on this list and I’ve lived in both Manhattan and Boston. I love both of those cities, but I can’t say I prefer either one over San Diego as a place to live full-time.

    Reply
  13. Tony from MKE at |

    I have explored eight of the ten cities listed–all but Philly and Seattle. I would say this list is remarkably on target and well done. It is nice to see the inclusion of my hometown of Milwaukee which is an unsung gem undiscovered by most. It is much like Chicago on a more manageable scale with many buildings of architectural significance–both historic and new. The lakefront and riverwalk are embraced unlike some cities which turn their backs on the water–Toronto immediately comes to mind. Even Chicago’s lakefront is tragically detached from the city by a freeway with a water view. Milwaukee’s former mayor John Norquist was a particularly fine steward of all that is good about urban life. He now heads the Congress for New Urbanism based 90 miles south in Chicago.

    Reply
  14. Lori at |

    I have been to several of these cities and agree with their inclusion. I live in metro Detroit and love going into the city. I have never felt like anything bad would happen to me there and have found that most people want to say “hi” and are very friendly. The architecture is amazing, too. I recently wandered into The Penobscot building and The Guardian and both are gorgeous. Talk about stepping back in time! I could go downtown every day for a month and find some old, magnificant building to tour.

    Also, Detroit boasts the 2nd largest theater district in the nation (New York is first). The Detroit Tigers, Detroit Lions and Detroit Red Wings all play downtown. There are many great museums, a great symphony…. the list goes on.

    Reply
    1. krock1dk at |

      Living in Metro Detroit makes you biased. Therefore, your opinion cant count.

      Reply
      1. Lori at |

        Sorry, I didn’t realize you were the authority on this. I do apologize. And, excuse me for being passionate about the area I live. My guess is if we could actually see you, you would have a hard time giving your opinion because people who are so negatively opinionated and have enough time to make so many negative comments are usually cowards. I’m actually from Ann Arbor, which isn’t considered part of metro Detroit, so, I think my opinion does count.

        My guess is the city located near you isn’t on the list, thus the bitterness.

        Reply
      2. Chris at |

        Hey Tony,

        I lived, went to school, and worked down town Detroit, now live in Denver. And you know something? I would go back in a heartbeat.

        I have been to Philly, Chi-town, NYC, and Boston…I can tell you that nothing beats the Detroit area.

        The only reason I even moved away from my precious city, and it is my precious city is the fact that my wife lived out in Denver.

        Yes I would totally put Detroit on this list. It still is a great city, and always will be a great city and beats any city out there.

        Besides, I gotta say, I still like the fact that I can tell jobbers like yourself that I am from Detroit and you cringe in fear. There’s no city in the world that can give that feeling to others outside of it, and still be awesome.

        Reply
    2. Missy at |

      That Detroit statistic is not backed up by any thing tangible except an article on the pro-Detroit website, experiencedetroit.com. I was an actress in NYC and Chi and grew up in on the North Shore of Milwaukee, and have lived in Minneapolis for years. Wikipedia states, “The region is second only to New York City in live theater per capita and is the third-largest theater market in the U.S. after New York City and Chicago…” When I lived in Chi, I heard the same thing about Minneapolis, but never about Detroit, and I was there often because a friend worked at the Free Press.

      My oldest son and I were in MKE last year and it was super safe to walk alone after dark, on the NE side of downtown. Having been to DTW in the past six months, I wouldn’t be caught dead without a knife-carrying muscle-bound man with me after dark on the streets of Downtown DTW, and since the husband doesn’t carry a knife…

      Reply
  15. Lawrence at |

    What? No Pittsburgh?… Fail list.

    Reply
    1. Nicholas at |

      I agree.. Pittsburgh belongs on this list instead of Detroit

      Reply
    2. c2check at |

      +1

      Reply
  16. Charlie at |

    Good list. I’ve been to every city on this list a few times…….there really are only a few other cities that arguably can make this list. The US, outside of the older parts of the country, primarily the East Coast and Midwest, doesn’t have many great down towns.

    Other cities San Diego, Pittsburgh, Minneapolis, Providence, Portland and maybe in a decade, Salt Lake City. That’s about it.

    Reply
  17. Charlie at |

    And Denver

    Reply
  18. krock1dk at |

    Detroit in the top Ten? ARE you kidding me? It has improved over the years but a top 10 ranking is ridiculous. Evidently these people have not been to Detroit. I have a very hard time believing downtown Detroit is better than really good downtowns like Minneapolis, Atlanta, Indy, Cleveland, Houston or the Vegas Strip. Nonsense!!!!

    Reply
  19. krock1dk at |

    This list is silly. A metro area’s quality of life is not defined by the overall size, cleanliness or liveliness of the downtown core. Just look at Portland, OR and Salt Lake–small downtowns but high quality of life. And there are many other examples.

    Reply
    1. David at |

      This list doesn’t attempt to say anything about the quality of the metro areas. This is a top 10 list of American DOWNTOWNS. I would agree that the list would have to be quite different if you were ranking by quality of life for the metropolitan area. If you want a list about quality of life in American metropolitan areas, there are about a million more relevant lists you could be commenting on.

      If you read the paragraph at the beginning, you’ll notice that these are the only aspects the author was considering when she made this list: “This list is based on size, vibrancy, architecture, businesses, and general aesthetics.”

      She also acknowledges that some smaller cities might have better downtown areas than some of the cities on the list, but I guess you have to draw a line somewhere of what constitutes a major metropolitan area: “While many smaller cities may boast impressive downtowns, this ranking focuses only on major metropolitan areas.” Remember, she’s still only talking about the DOWNTOWN areas.

      Reply
  20. krock1dk at |

    I cant believe Indianapolis didnt make the list, especially when Detroit did! WTF? Indy’s downtown is very active almost every day and has seen a total turrnaround from the 1980s. There is always something going on, especially on Sat nights. The Super Bowl in Feb is just one of them. Indy has a clean and safe downtown. Museums within a short distance, the Canal Walk, Circle Center, hotels, the Colts, Pacers, Indians, lots of green space and part of the Monon Trail. Indy is often under-rated.

    Reply
    1. TexasBoy at |

      DT Indianapolis is good, I’d say its better than Milwaukee to be honest. Still, I wouldn’t consider either to be one of the 10 best downtowns. It’s definitely in the top 20 though.

      Reply
  21. krock1dk at |

    The people writing this article/survey did not do their research on Detroit and have evidently not been there. With the exception of GM (Renaissance Center), the other of the Big Three are in the suburbs outside the city and have done NOTHING for downtown Detroit. Ford is in Dearborn and Chrysler-Fiat is in Auburn Hills.

    Ive been all over the country and have my own list (no particular order):

    New York
    Chicago
    Washington DC
    Philadelphia
    Seattle
    San Francisco
    Houston
    Atlanta
    Cleveland
    Minneapolis

    Reply
    1. TexasBoy at |

      Houston?! Houston has a nice big skyline, but that is it. It’s nothing but office buildings and parking lots in its downtown. Very few restaurants, very little shopping, very few residents, very little nightlife, very few cultural institutions…downtown Houston is basically a glorified office park. Houston is a good city overall, but downtown is its weakest point. I don’t think I’d put DT Houston on a list of 25 best downtowns to be honest.

      Reply
  22. garymawla at |

    Where’s Downtown San Jose? Have you been to Downtown San Jose? If you have, what’s wrong with it? It has everything a downtown should have. I’ve been to most downtowns, and they’re grittier, ditier, less safe and not as dyanamic as San Jose’s

    Reply
    1. TexasBoy at |

      I don’t recall anyone saying there is anything wrong with DT San Jose, but you honestly think it is one of the 10 best downtowns in the country? Its certainly fine and has all of the essentials, but what makes it of the 10 best?

      Reply
      1. Gary Mawla at |

        I’ve been to Minneapolis and Detroit, and Downtown San Jose is certainly better than those downtowns. I even think Downtown San Jose is better than Portland’s and Washington’s, too. Haven’t you been to Downtown San Jose?

        Reply
  23. TexasBoy at |

    Overall a decent list, but I’d make a few changes. I wouldn’t put Downtown DC so high. DC has a lot of great neighborhoods outside of Downtown, but the Downtown itself is just office/government buildings one after another and museums. There isn’t a large variety, and hardly anyone lives in Downtown DC. I spent a few years there, so I know it well. DC is working hard to expand and further develop its downtown though, but for now, I don’t think I’d place it above Chicago, SF, Philly, or Boston. I think it will outdo them one day though due it’s tremendous growth and wealth. Milwaukee is fine and is getting better, but it’s certainly not top 10. Same with Miami. Miami is a great city, but it’s downtown isn’t great. Miami Beach is great though, but it’s not downtown.

    My Top 10:

    1. New York
    2. Chicago
    3. San Francisco
    4. Philadelphia
    5. Boston
    6. Washington
    7. Seattle
    8. Portland
    9. Minneapolis
    10. Detroit

    Reply
    1. Taylor Blackwell at |

      You obviously haven’t been to DC in a while. I am a native, having recently moved back after 11 years away and I was astonished. DC’s downtown is full of new restaurants, shopping, theater, clubs, bars and plenty of condos. when I grew up here, the sidewalks rolled up at 5 when the government workers left to go home. Now, when the government offices close, there are plenty of folks here, taking in a game at Verizon Center, seeing a show at the Shakespeare Theater, having dinner/drinks at any one of a number of places here. You should come back and visit…I think you would be surprised. There are plenty of people that live and work in downtown DC. It really does deserve a place on this list.

      Reply
    2. Nicholas at |

      TexasBoy: Chicago is way too high on your list. San Fran and Boston are both nicer downtowns. I agree with the addition of Portland but not Minneapolis. Why did you include Detroit but take off Milwaukee? Milwaukee’s downtown far exceeds that of Detroit but I wouldn’t put it higher than 8 on the list.

      Reply
  24. Jac at |

    Surprised to see Milwaukee on the list. Mostly cause it’s often over looked because of proximity of Chicago. I agree we do have a good downtown and depending on where your at it’s pretty foot accessible. If we get the transit system in better shape I would be even more pleased.

    Reply
    1. Nicholas at |

      Milwaukee’s downtown will only improve if and when the streetcar is built there.

      Reply
  25. ChasCroix at |

    I agree with the Pittsburgh Fail comment, the author of this list has obviously never been to Pittsburgh. There is honestly no other skyline and downtown area like it on the face of the planet, absolute and total failure. Detroit? Cut it out.

    Reply
    1. Nicholas at |

      I agree. Pittsburgh definitely belongs on this list. Detroit has no business on this list and its very inclusion calls the author’s credibility into question.

      Reply
  26. jdizzle at |

    I would rank them…

    NYC
    Chicago
    SF
    DC
    Boston
    Philadelphia
    Seattle

    after that who cares, there is a big drop off.

    Reply
  27. David at |

    I’ve been to every city on this list with the exception of Milwakee. Washington DC’s downtown is clean and fairly vibrant, but nowhere near that of Chicago or San Francisco. NYC has the most impressive, vibrant and crowded downtown, but San Francisco should be a close second. Downtown San Francisco is the 2nd most densely populated and has more going on then Chicago’s- though smaller in terms of area.

    1. New York City
    2. San Francisco
    3. Chicago
    4. Boston
    5. Philadelphia
    6. Honolulu
    7. San Diego
    8. Houston
    9. Miami
    10. Dallas

    Reply
  28. Kevin at |

    What is this fascination with DC being ranked as in the top 5 on this site. DC is the nation’s capitol but the downtown can not compare to San Francisco, Chicago, or Philadelphia. Philadelphia is the 3rd most populous downtown in the United States. I live in Philadelphia’s Center City which can boast to having the 3rd most populous downtown area with over 58,000 people who live in it. The city’s CBD employs about 220, 000 people and it’s downtown feels like a downtown with a vibrancy of people.

    1. New York City
    2. Chicago
    3. San Francisco
    4. Philadelphia
    5. DC
    6. Boston
    7. Seattle
    8. Houston
    9. Miami
    10. Dallas

    Reply
  29. Detroit313 at |

    Detroit kills any city in any sporting event Still ! indianapolis is a suburn cause there was nothing there ever besides a waste of a super bowl which wasnt considered a “super” bowl based on it ratings

    Reply
  30. indianapolis kid at |

    So detroit might be cooler but here in indianpolis the population is 30% gay

    Reply
  31. Brad at |

    Chicago has an inferior complex? The city that invented the skyscraper is second to none. You ignorant peeps just accept that Chicago is one of the most beautiful cities in the USA and the world. If you don’t agree, you’ve obviously never been to the city. Deal with it people that NYC and Chicago are miles ahead of any downtowns in the USA. Sf is a distant third IMHO :)

    Reply
  32. Denver10 at |

    I totally agree that Denver isn’t that great, and I never said it was. But Chicago (IMO) is in no way comparable to NYC. That’s like comparing Kansas City to Chicago or something. NYC absolutely kills Chicago.

    Reply
    1. paul at |

      Denver is better than Detroit by a long shot.

      Reply
  33. paul at |

    Detroit’s downtown has fares better than the rest of the city? That is downtown is like a ghost town. There is empty store fronts every where down there. I’m from Colorado and the fact that you put Detroit in this list and not Denver debases all your credibility.

    Reply
  34. DJ at |
    Reply
  35. DJ at |

    HOUSTON, TEXAS, USA

    Reply
  36. Jeremy at |

    I’m from Miami, Miami’s downtown is pretty irrelevant, nothing much goes on there except work, and nighttime is pretty depressing.

    Reply
    1. edo at |

      I agree. Putting Miami on the list made the other choices suspect. I worked in downtown Miami for several years—boring, dirty and dangerous.

      Reply
  37. Jay at |

    I was just in Kansas City, while it’s not top 10 worthy, it is definitely bigger and more impressive than I thought it would be.

    Reply
  38. Scott at |

    Have you seen Detroit lately?

    Reply
  39. Green Line at |

    Washington, DC does not belong ahead of Chicago in this ranking. Credibility is lost with that one. But at least everyone seems to be in agreement that Los Angeles belongs nowhere on this list and, although in the same status as NYC and Chicago on many levels, L.A. downtown is not comparable to them. However, it must be said: if Detroit and Milwaukee made the list, well then, isn’t L.A.’s downtown as good as those?

    Reply
    1. David at |

      I’d argue it’s much harder to define the “downtown” area of L.A. than most of the other cities on this list. L.A. just keeps going and going and going, and while it has a lot of nice stuff, it’s all very spread out and you could easily lump attractions 45 minutes away from each other into some definitions of “downtown.” L.A. doesn’t have so much of a core, it’s more of a sprawling mass of activity, the heart of which is difficult to pinpoint. Detroit and Milwaukee both have very clearly defined downtown areas, and while maybe (probably) the Los Angeles metro area is better than Detroit’s or Milwaukee’s, its downtown is definitely not as cohesive or vibrant.

      Reply
      1. Oscar at |

        What?! Perhaps you have never been to Los Angeles. It does have a well defined downtown. Of course Los Angeles is polycentric, but it does have a defined downtown. And to not put it on this list might be a bit shortsighted. Although not the best measurement, didn’t you see GQ’s recent article on it?

        Reply
  40. Kirsten at |

    Really thrilled to see Detroit mentioned!! Recently traveled there (and I live in New York), and was thoroughly impressed.

    Reply
  41. Corwin9 at |

    DETROIT? I have been to downtown Detroit. It is certainly making a comeback. Campus Martius in the middle of it is very nice with lots of programs. But Outside of that it’s D.E.A.D. dead after 5pm. Yes there are some stadiums and attractions, but when you compare the lack of street life to, say, New Orleans, or Portland, or Pittsburgh, or Minneapolis…the inclusion of Detroit is a giant gaping hole in this list’s credibility. Maybe it deserved a #11 “special mention” spot for being the Most Improved? Sure. But #9 for the whole country? What a joke! I’m laughing my ass off.

    Reply
    1. 517 at |
      Reply

Leave a Reply